CBS 1989 voiceover over "This Is America, Charlie Brown" end credits promoted "Dallas" episode about a "failed drug deal"

Previously I posted about the Parents Television Council's misleading claim about ABC's transition between You're Not Elected, Charlie Brown and a sex scene in the show Scandal.

Well, well, well. I was on Youtube watching network closing credits/intershow sequences from the '80s and '90s. The great thing about Youtube is that you can see primetime TV as it used to be, as it seems to be the repository for people to upload their old off-air video recordings. And I stumbled upon this video with the closing credits/commercial breaks for the CBS March 10, 1989 broadcast of This Is America, Charlie Brown. At the 0:14 mark - marked in the URL for your convenience (just add &t=XmXs after the YouTube video URL to make the video start at whichever time marker you wish, M for minutes and S for seconds and X for any number 0 to 60) - the closing credits roll. Shortly, the end credits drum & pipes music (sounds like a 4th of July marching band) gets quiet as the voice over announcer says, "Later tonight, a failed drug deal opens the door for J.R. to ruin the competition. A night of surprises on Dallas."

Ya see that? Quite a jump right there. Following a kids' cartoon special touting great American inventors and before another family oriented special Marvin: Baby of the Year, many kids must've been like, "Mommy, what's a drug deal?" (No word how many of them suffered negative consequences such as, y'know, prison time 25 years after.) And startled parents lie with a reference to the drugstore.

The PTC argued against ABC's scheduling of the Charlie Brown specials in their "Worst of the Week" review of last week's Scandal episode:

The ABC network is really at fault in this situation because they are ultimately responsible for the content that actually makes it to broadcast. But it doesn’t seem like anyone at ABC cares whether or not a beloved family-friendly Peanuts cartoon should be shown immediately before an adult themed drama rated TV-14 for suggestive dialogue, offensive language, with depictions of sex and violence.

...

 The ABC network appeals to different audiences on different days of the week. No one is questioning whether Scandal and the other Shonda Rhimes’ dramas, are meant for adults. The creator herself admits that she does not “self-censor” based on principle. The fact remains that ABC advertised and aired a program meant for young children and families to view and they intentionally aired an episode of a series that is clearly meant for adults. On any other day of the week, ABC’s programming is significantly less violent and sexually explicit than on Thursdays. Which begs the question, what is the system the networks use to determine which shows are to air at what times? Until a more consistent representation of a family oriented primetime block is established, ABC’s Scandal will remain the Worst TV Show of the Week.

The ABC network appeals to different audiences on different days of the week. No one is questioning whether Scandal and the other Shonda Rhimes’ dramas, are meant for adults. The creator herself admits that she does not “self-censor” based on principle. The fact remains that ABC advertised and aired a program meant for young children and families to view and they intentionally aired an episode of a series that is clearly meant for adults. On any other day of the week, ABC’s programming is significantly less violent and sexually explicit than on Thursdays. Which begs the question, what is the system the networks use to determine which shows are to air at what times? Until a more consistent representation of a family oriented primetime block is established, ABC’s Scandal will remain the Worst TV Show of the Week. - See more at: http://w2.parentstv.org/Main/News/Detail.aspx?docID=3189#sthash.ojuTc1PZ.dpuf

The PTC's call for a "more consistent...family oriented primetime block" as well as concern about the Charlie Brown show being before more mature shows is flawed, due to various factors in primetime network programming and marketing:

• The networks typically show the Charlie Brown holiday specials whether Great Pumpkin or A Charlie Brown Christmas at most 7 days before the respective holidays. In this case, ABC showed Great Pumpkin on Oct. 30, the night before Halloween. This way, the show reaches a potentially larger audience of families on Oct. 30 as opposed to Oct. 31 when children will more likely trick-or-treat than watch TV.
• Also, could ABC have shown Great Pumpkin any other night? No, since the specials would've pre-empted other youth-oriented, higher-rated 8pm shows that the PTC would favor...
• Sunday: Once Upon a Time (not to mention being up against Sunday Night Football on NBC as well)
• Monday:   Dancing with the Stars
• Tuesday: The Great Halloween Fright Flight, a show that got the PTC's "Best of the Week" award.
• Wednesday: The Middle (a show that the PTC has awarded multiple "Best of the Week" reviews) and The Goldbergs

The Charlie Brown specials pre-empted Grey's Anatomy that week. Grey's Anatomy is in its 10th season by now and is still often in the top 25 weekly ratings, so the show has marketed itself enough to the primetime audience, to take weeks off. (Think about how Greg Popovich rests his "Big Three" players Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, and Tony Parker a few games a year for the San Antonio Spurs.)  Sheesh, I can't help but think the PTC is becoming increasingly intellectually lazy in its analysis of TV, for an organization that claims to have the "world's largest archive of prime-time network television" dating back to 1989.

But to my greater point. It's not a new trend for networks to put kid friendly primetime specials right before the grown-ups' shows as my example of scheduling This Is America, Charlie Brown and Marvin: Baby of the Year before Dallas in March 1989 shows. Also, for more recent times, I wonder if the PTC complained about:

• Dec. 18, 2012: Happy Endings, a show the PTC doesn't recommend for viewers under 18 due to frequent sexual content, following A Charlie Brown Christmas on ABC?
• Or Dec. 2, 2010, when Grey's Anatomy followed Santa Claus Is Comin' To Town on ABC?
• Dec. 8, 2008: A 2-hour Boston Legal followed Charlie Brown Christmas on ABC. The PTC's take on Boston? "Offensive sexual content is the show’s primary concern. Denny Crane in particular makes many jokes of a sexual nature."

And even in the supposedly more innocent pre-1990s eras,

• Dec. 11, 1987: Dallas followed Charlie Brown Christmas and How the Grinch Stole Christmas on CBS (both holiday specials' rights transferred to ABC by the millennium).  If the PTC were around in the '80s, it'd be frequently trashing Dallas as "Worst of the Week" given the kind of storylines in the show and pretty much any soap opera.
• Dec. 19, 1990: Crime drama Jake and the Fatman followed Charlie Brown Xmas.
• Another interesting juxtaposition. During commercial breaks of ABC's Dec. 16, 1987 broadcast of A Muppet Family Christmas, there was a promo for Sledge Hammer! showing a character firing a gun in a police station then looking at the barrel as the announcer says, "Sledge lets his gun do the talking." An anthromorphized gun with a barrel moving like a mouth says, "read my lips." Definitely not a good advertising fit for a special featuring Sesame Street characters. What's worse? That ad was right after a kiddie cereal ad with a  young girl and animated animals. Source: 44:44 of this video.

Even for a non-profit organization, the PTC's Charlie Brown/Scandal snafu - whose main piece of evidence they've yet to acknowledge is an edited video -  sounds awfully much like those misleading clickbait stories peddled by money-grubbing-by-misleading-readers sites like Buzzfeed, The Blaze, or Huffington Post. I wonder if the PTC is really that desperate for attention and donations?

The ABC network is really at fault in this situation because they are ultimately responsible for the content that actually makes it to broadcast. But it doesn’t seem like anyone at ABC cares whether or not a beloved family-friendly Peanuts cartoon should be shown immediately before an adult themed drama rated TV-14 for suggestive dialogue, offensive language, with depictions of sex and violence. - See more at: http://w2.parentstv.org/Main/News/Detail.aspx?docID=3189#sthash.ojuTc1PZ.dpuf

The ABC network is really at fault in this situation because they are ultimately responsible for the content that actually makes it to broadcast. But it doesn’t seem like anyone at ABC cares whether or not a beloved family-friendly Peanuts cartoon should be shown immediately before an adult themed drama rated TV-14 for suggestive dialogue, offensive language, with depictions of sex and violence. - See more at: http://w2.parentstv.org/Main/News/Detail.aspx?docID=3189#sthash.ojuTc1PZ.dpuf

The ABC network is really at fault in this situation because they are ultimately responsible for the content that actually makes it to broadcast. But it doesn’t seem like anyone at ABC cares whether or not a beloved family-friendly Peanuts cartoon should be shown immediately before an adult themed drama rated TV-14 for suggestive dialogue, offensive language, with depictions of sex and violence. - See more at: http://w2.parentstv.org/Main/News/Detail.aspx?docID=3189#sthash.ojuTc1PZ.dpuf

The ABC network is really at fault in this situation because they are ultimately responsible for the content that actually makes it to broadcast. But it doesn’t seem like anyone at ABC cares whether or not a beloved family-friendly Peanuts cartoon should be shown immediately before an adult themed drama rated TV-14 for suggestive dialogue, offensive language, with depictions of sex and violence. - See more at: http://w2.parentstv.org/Main/News/Detail.aspx?docID=3189#sthash.ojuTc1PZ.dp

The ABC network is really at fault in this situation because they are ultimately responsible for the content that actually makes it to broadcast. But it doesn’t seem like anyone at ABC cares whether or not a beloved family-friendly Peanuts cartoon should be shown immediately before an adult themed drama rated TV-14 for suggestive dialogue, offensive language, with depictions of sex and violence. - See more at: http://w2.parentstv.org/Main/News/Detail.aspx?docID=3189#sthash.ojuTc1PZ.dpu

The ABC network is really at fault in this situation because they are ultimately responsible for the content that actually makes it to broadcast. But it doesn’t seem like anyone at ABC cares whether or not a beloved family-friendly Peanuts cartoon should be shown immediately before an adult themed drama rated TV-14 for suggestive dialogue, offensive language, with depictions of sex and violence. - See more at: http://w2.parentstv.org/Main/News/Detail.aspx?docID=3189#sthash.ojuTc1PZ.dpuf

Parents Television Council misleads about ABC's broadcast of "Scandal" after "You're Not Elected, Charlie Brown"

For an organization that claims to "promote and restore responsibility and decency to the entertainment industry in answer to America's demand for positive, family-oriented television programming," maybe a little bit of something called honesty should come with that mission. And heck, maybe the PTC themselves ought to exercise "responsibility" as well.

Why? It turns out...the PTC lied about ABC. H/T: Kristin Dos Santos of E! Online:

"Shame on ABC for putting a peep show next to a playground. In less than 26 seconds we were taken from the Peanuts pumpkin patch to a steamy Scandal sex scene," PTC president Tim Winter said.

Along with their statement, the PTC included a link to this video, which shows a quick flash of a Marvel commercial and then the start of Scandal, with a little bit of swimming in a pool and then Kerry Washington and Scott Foley in bed together... [video embedded in link]

Well, we checked back on to our own DVR's, and oddly enough, we had a distinctively different transition than the PTC's clip, with a longer transition from the end of Charlie Brown to Scandal. Our transition was about 30 seconds longer. Check it out…[video also embedded in link]

Wow.  So those who watched the PTC's video (which now has become the outrage-of-the-day on sites like The Blaze that aren't exactly known for journalistic integrity) get a misleading impression. The PTC's video, which is embedded on the Dos Santos article, edited out most of the split-screen end credits so that the viewer sees the last scene of You're Not Elected, Charlie Brown, then a sequence "an all-new Scandal starts now" (with the copyright boilerplate for Charlie Brown underneath). But the unedited network recording provided by Dos Santos shows two network promos between the last Charlie Brown scene and first Scandal scene superimposed over the Charlie Brown end credits: first a promo for an upcoming Marvel Comics special then a trailer promoting the new Scandal episode.

(Edit 11/6) Just realized that ABC had another Charlie Brown show between It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown (8pm) and Scandal at 9pm. At 8:30 was You're Not Elected, Charlie Brown. Which makes Winter's statement about being "taken from the Peanuts pumpkin patch to a steamy Scandal sex scene" even less accurate.

Given these facts, do you really buy into PTC president Tim Winter's statement: "Unless parents had the remote control in their hand, thumb on the button and aimed directly at the TV screen, they didn't have a chance [to change the channel]"? So far, the PTC has been getting some flak over their poutrage on Facebook such as:

"New Scandal Next" shows for at LEAST 4 seconds, bottom left. These adverts are usually at least 10-15 seconds long, if not longer. You should know Scandal is not a children's show, therefore they should have been removed before the preview even began. Swimming starts at 11.8 seconds, in this video, meaning you knew scandal was starting for at least ~30 seconds.. Scene begins at 31.6 seconds. So almost an entire minute after you know scandal is coming on, and a preview has started, you failed to stop your children from watching the TV.

To me, this says you weren't watching your children and let them sit in front of the TV without you around, then you heard the noise from the show, were like wtf, and got mad you suck at parenting when your kids watched a mature scene on the tube. Or, you don't care what your children watch 

with/without you as long as it doesn't involve this kind of mature setting.

 And:

PTC must running low on funds, they're plucking this chicken for all its worth. I guess they missed the TV rating in the first frame of a show that's in its third season.

Also:

I see all the complaints and have read only one offered solution. I would like to know what should ABC have done? What would have satisfied the PTC? What would have been considered the "right" thing to do?

My opinion, ABC did what it was suppose to do. They warned Scandal was coming up next, they posted the TV rating, and they aired the show at its normal and appropriate time. I know the PTC parents are fully aware of what show content is like during the 8 pm - 10 pm hours so, in my opinion, the parents should have been present to shut off the tv once Charlie Brown ended and yes you had plenty of time if you were in the same room with your children when it ended.

And:

If you watch the video just after Charlie Brown ends a commercial starts and it then appears as though it was fast forwarded because it jumps from "Tuesday" and showing Iron Man to the Scandal slate screen and "New Scandal starts now on ABC" and there was more than enough time to change the channel or turn the tv off. I know I had plenty of time between the time the show I was watching, on another channel, ended and the time Scandal started to change the channel and not miss any of Scandal and even saw the slate screen. ABC shows Charlie Brown every year in a prime time slot and then goes straight back to their normal programming so parents should have known that and made sure to be in the room and ready to change the channel or turn off the tv after Charlie Brown ended. Quit complaining and take responsibility for yourself, your children, and both of your actions.

And:

I just watched the transition. You can't be serious. ABC has an AD for Scandal in the bottom right hand corner, so it is not any sort of surprise AND Scandal has a clearly marked TV-14 rating box in the top corner. It was clear as day what was coming up. If you don't want your kids seeing that, CHANGE THE CHANNEL. You're the Parents Television Council. Do some parenting before you complain about TV.

I wonder who has more relevance in this era, the PTC or (to dig in '90s nostalgia memories, since the PTC was founded in 1995) - Deep Blue Something? It's OK for the PTC to criticize Scandal and recommend against parents letting their children watch it. But to mislead its members of how ABC showed a risque show right after Charlie Brown? No wonder the PTC isn't relevant anymore (besides Netflix and Hulu presenting a market threat to traditional broadcast/cable nowadays).